Asemic Writing / Asemic Drawing

January 22, 2026

Asemic Writing / Asemic Drawing

Assemic Writing is something I encoutered in te Mail-Art network years ago. On the IUOMA platform there are also lots of samples. Also in my workd this element is poping up now and then and recently I even started a Asemic Drawings Group on Facebook to make the work more known'

https://www.facebook.com/groups/asemicdrawings

On the new Grokopedia I found an interesting article about it. Because it might change during the coming years I downloaded it to have a time-frame of how it is seen these days:

Asemic writing

Asemic writing is a form of visual art that emulates the graphic structure of written language—such as scripts, ideograms, or calligraphy—while deliberately lacking specific semantic content or decipherable meaning, allowing viewers to engage with it through aesthetic, emotional, or interpretive lenses rather than literal reading.^[1] The term "asemic," derived from the Greek prefix a- (absence) and sema (sign), underscores this absence of fixed signification, positioning it as an "open" semantic form that suspends the tension between looking at and reading text.^[2]Coined between 1998 and 2000 by Australian visual poet Tim Gaze and American artist Jim Leftwich, asemic writing emerged as a response to crises in traditional literacy amid the rise of digital media and challenges to logocentrism, building on earlier precedents in modern art.^[1] Its origins trace back to the early 20th century, particularly through surrealist influences, with Belgian artist Henri Michaux pioneering gestural, non-representational scripts in works like Alphabet (1927), which explored automatic writing and the ineffable beyond verbal constraints.^[2] Other historical figures, including Cy Twombly's scrawled markings and Roland Barthes's semiotic deconstructions, contributed to its conceptual foundations by blurring the boundaries between writing, drawing, and abstraction.^[3]As a multidisciplinary practice intersecting visual poetry, performance, and graphic design, asemic writing emphasizes the gestural act of mark-making over content, often drawing from influences like Wassily Kandinsky's non-objective art and Joan Miró's surreal symbols to evoke "otherness" or universal forms of communication.^[1] Contemporary practitioners such as Michael Jacobson, Rosaire Appel, and Christopher Skinner extend this tradition through books, installations, and digital works that invite cognitive dissonance and personal meaning-making, challenging the hegemony of semantic text in an era of global visual languages like computer code.^[3] Notable examples include Luigi Serafini's Codex Seraphinianus (1976–1978), an encyclopedic imaginary language, and invented scripts in science fiction, which parallel asemic writing's playful yet constrained exploration of form without fixed interpretation.^[1]

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Asemic writing is a form of visual art that mimics the graphical and structural elements of written language or script while deliberately eschewing any literal semantic content, thereby functioning through visual abstraction, suggestion, and aesthetic intuition rather than conveying specific meanings.^[4] Derived etymologically from the Greek prefix "a-" combined with "sema" (sign), it represents an absence of fixed signs or decodable symbols, often described as a wordless, open semantic mode of expression that invites viewers to project their own interpretations onto the forms.^[2] This approach positions asemic writing at the intersection of text and image, where calligraphic-like marks evoke the rhythm and density of language without relying on conventional linguistic rules.^[5]At its core, asemic writing operates on principles of ambiguity and interpretive freedom, fusing the visual dynamics of script—such as lines, curves, and spatial arrangements—with abstract artistry to minimize recognizable gestures, syntax, or phonetic cues that might imply conventional meaning.^[4] It emphasizes the viewer's subjective engagement over any predetermined authorial intent, creating a semantically open space where forms suggest narrative or emotional resonance through pure aesthetics rather than verbal communication.^[5] This intentional void of semantics allows the work to transcend linguistic barriers, relating universally to concepts like color, sound, and movement in a manner akin to abstract art.^[2]Asemic writing distinctly differs from illegible handwriting, which presupposes an underlying intent to communicate despite poor execution, and from encrypted or coded texts, which conceal decipherable meanings beneath obfuscation.^[4] Instead, its hallmark is the purposeful meaninglessness, where the absence of decodable structure prevents any attempt at translation or revelation of hidden content, focusing solely on the experiential impact of the visual forms themselves.^[2] This sets it apart as a heterotopic practice in visual culture, challenging the expectation of signification inherent in traditional scripts.^[5]

Visual and Conceptual Characteristics

Asemic writing is distinguished by its visual elements that imitate the formal qualities of script while eschewing semantic content, often featuring fluid, quasi-calligraphic gestures that draw from diverse traditions such as Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Arabic calligraphy.^[6] These works employ invented glyphs—unique systems of abstract signs and marks that resemble letters or numerals but resist conventional decoding—and incorporate repetitive patterns through variations in line weight, density, and irregularity, such as ink blots or deliberate errors.^[6] Spatial arrangements mimic the rhythmic flow of handwriting across the page, emphasizing gesture and movement over linear progression, which creates an illusion of legibility without actual readability.^[3] This aesthetic evokes a cognitive dissonance, where the familiarity of script form estranges the viewer, producing a "productive tension" between recognition and incomprehension.^[3]Conceptually, asemic writing leverages ambiguity to evoke emotion, rhythm, and a sense of universality, functioning as a non-linguistic medium that challenges the normative power of language by negating decipherable meaning.^[6] Its marks, described as "gestural relations," convey an "absent presence" that reflects psychological dispositions and invites free association, shrouded in mystery that resists cultural or symbolic interpretation.^[3] By prioritizing the emotional impact over semantic transmission, it promotes an anarchist-like subversion of linguistic hierarchies, allowing the work to resonate as a visual rhythm akin to breath or pulse.^[6]The interpretive freedom inherent in asemic writing transforms it into a collaborative endeavor, where viewers project personal meanings onto the ambiguous forms, effectively co-creating the piece as a visual poem.^[6] This openness fosters joy in the absence of translation, as observers translate the "emotional effect of the marks" into their own narratives, deepening engagement through illegibility rather than resolution.^[3]

Historical Development

Origins and Early Influences

The roots of asemic writing can be traced to ancient and pre-modern visual systems that blurred the boundaries between meaningful script and abstract symbolism, particularly through undeciphered scripts whose glyphs resemble writing but resist semantic interpretation. For instance, Linear A, a syllabic script used by the Minoan civilization around 1800–1450 BCE on Crete, features intricate linear symbols that have remained undeciphered despite extensive study, evoking a form of visual notation devoid of accessible meaning and prefiguring asemic abstraction.^[4] Similarly, the Rongorongo script from Rapa Nui ([Easter Island](/page/Easter Island)), dating to the 15th century or earlier and consisting of glyph-like carvings on wooden tablets, represents an independent invention of proto-writing that appears as elaborate signage without a confirmed linguistic decoding, highlighting early experiments in non-verbal graphic expression.^[7] These systems underscore a historical fascination with marks that mimic language while transcending it, laying conceptual groundwork for later wordless forms.In early civilizations, pictographs and ideograms further contributed to this foundation by evolving from representational images into abstracted signs, often prioritizing visual impact over phonetic precision. Sumerian cuneiform, originating around 3200 BCE in Mesopotamia, began as pictographic impressions on clay tablets depicting objects like grain or animals, gradually abstracting into wedge-shaped ideograms that conveyed ideas through form rather than direct verbal equivalence, thus emphasizing the gestural and aesthetic qualities of inscription.^[8] This progression from concrete imagery to stylized abstraction mirrors the visual logic of asemic writing, where the act of marking evokes communication without adhering to decipherable content.By the 19th century, precursors emerged in practices like automatic writing, a technique rooted in spiritualist movements where individuals produced script-like forms through unconscious or trance-induced gestures, often resulting in illegible or abstract patterns that bypassed intentional semantics. Concurrently, non-Western calligraphy traditions provided influential models of flourish and abstraction; in Chinese calligraphy from the Tang Dynasty (618–907 CE), artists like those featured in historical anthologies employed sweeping, expressive strokes that prioritized rhythmic beauty over strict legibility, resembling asemic fluidity.^[9] Arabic calligraphy, with its intricate, non-figural ornamentation in scripts like Kufic, similarly abstracted letters into decorative motifs that emphasized visual harmony, influencing conceptual explorations of writing as pure form.Conceptually, the notion of "writing without words" arose in esoteric and artistic contexts well before modern formalization, as seen in alternative literacies of Mesoamerica and the Andes, where pre-Columbian systems like Aztec pictography used icons and symbols to record history and knowledge independent of alphabetic structure, treating inscription as a visual mnemonic rather than phonetic transcription. These traditions collectively fostered an understanding of script as an open, interpretive medium, paving the way for asemic writing's evolution in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Evolution in the 20th and 21st Centuries

The formal recognition of asemic writing emerged in the mid-20th century amid broader experimental art movements, with artists like Henri Michaux producing influential works such as Mouvements (1950–1951), which featured gestural, illegible scripts exploring the boundaries between writing and drawing.^[10] Argentine artist Mirtha Dermisache began creating extensive asemic manuscripts in the 1960s, including booklets and postcards that mimicked textual forms without semantic content, influencing the genre's development as a visual-poetic practice.^[11] The related Italian term "scritture asemantiche" (asemantic writings) was coined in 1974 by Italian art critic Gillo Dorfles to describe similar non-semantic works by Irma Blank, marking an early conceptualization of writing without fixed meaning.^[12] The English term "asemic writing" was coined between 1998 and 2000 by visual poets Jim Leftwich and Tim Gaze, who revived and formalized the concept through their collaborative exchanges, defining it as a "wordless open semantic form of writing" in a 1998 letter that circulated within experimental poetry circles.^[1][13] This period also saw connections to concrete poetry, where typographic experimentation blurred linguistic and visual elements, and to the Fluxus movement, which emphasized performative and anti-establishment approaches to language and art.^[14][15]In the late 20th century, asemic writing gained traction through underground networks like mail art and self-published zines, particularly in the 1980s and 1990s, where artists exchanged illegible scripts as part of international correspondence projects that challenged conventional communication. Gaze launched Asemic magazine in 1998, initially as a modest pamphlet that documented and disseminated asemic works, fostering the first dedicated community for the practice and bridging it with small-press and mail art traditions.^[9]Entering the 21st century, asemic writing expanded globally via digital tools and online platforms after 2000, enabling artists to generate and share computer-assisted scripts through software like drawing programs and code-based generators, which introduced new layers of algorithmic abstraction.^[16] Websites such as asemic.net (founded by Gaze) and blogs like The New Post-Literate facilitated international collaboration, turning asemic writing into a networked movement with contributions from diverse regions.^[17] Key publications, including the 2013 An Anthology of Asemic Handwriting edited by Gaze and Michael Jacobson, compiled global examples and solidified its interdisciplinary reach, while applications in science fiction—such as xenoglyphs mimicking alien languages in literature and comics—highlighted its role in evoking otherworldly narratives by the 2020s.^[9][18][19]

Styles and Techniques

Major Styles

Asemic writing encompasses several major styles, each distinguished by its visual form and expressive approach, ranging from fluid simulations of handwriting to rigid symbolic constructs and amorphous shapes that merge textual illusion with abstract artistry. These styles emphasize aesthetic and interpretive potential over linguistic meaning, drawing from diverse cultural influences to create works that invite viewer projection.The calligraphic style features fluid, handwriting-like marks that evoke personal script through gestural abstractions, often mimicking the rhythmic flow of traditional calligraphy while remaining illegible.^[5] Pioneering examples include the wild cursive scripts of Tang Dynasty calligrapher Zhang Xu, whose vigorous, grass-like strokes prioritize expressive energy over readability.^[20] Contemporary practitioners like Michael Jacobson extend this approach in works such as The Giant's Fence (2001), an 80-page manuscript of intuitive, calligraphic gestures that abstract conventional writing forms.^[5]In contrast, the geometric style employs structured, symbol-based forms resembling invented alphabets or runes, with precise lines, angles, and repeating patterns that suggest encoded languages without semantic content.^[5] Artist Cecil Touchon's asemic pieces, such as those in his Fusion series, layer geometric motifs to create dense, typographic-like compositions that explore abstraction through ordered mark-making.^[21] This style often evokes ancient scripts or futuristic ciphers, emphasizing symmetry and modularity in its visual architecture.^[20]Organic and abstract styles present free-form, biomorphic shapes that blend the appearance of text with pure visual art, allowing for fluid distortions and natural contours that transcend scripted conventions.^[22] These works prioritize intuitive, evolving forms over rigidity, as seen in Lisa Kokin's Asemic series, where stitched threads form wild, expressive patterns on paper that simulate handwritten scripts with organic vitality.^[22] Global variations within this category highlight cultural divergences, such as dense, clustered compositions inspired by Asian calligraphic traditions versus the sparse, minimalist arrangements common in Western practices, reflecting broader interpretive openness in asemic expression.^[20] Techniques like layering or distortion, as explored in dedicated asemic anthologies, further enhance these styles' abstract fusion with visual elements.^[20]

Creation Methods

Asemic writing is produced through a range of methods that prioritize visual abstraction and gestural freedom over linguistic meaning. Traditional creation approaches rely on hand-drawing techniques using tools such as ink, brushes, or pencils to generate fluid marks that evoke script-like forms without semantic intent.^[23] These methods draw from calligraphic traditions, blending painting and writing to explore the boundaries of visual expression.^[24]Automatic drawing, heavily influenced by Surrealist practices, forms a core traditional technique, involving spontaneous and unplanned mark-making to access subconscious impulses and create ambiguous, non-referential symbols.^[24] This process emphasizes intuition, often described as allowing lines to emerge without preconceived structure, fostering a therapeutic release through seemingly nonsensical gestures.^[24]Experimental techniques expand these foundations by incorporating collage, where fragments of diverse scripts or visual elements are assembled into layered, indecipherable compositions that disrupt readability.^[24] Erasure and alteration methods further contribute by obscuring or modifying existing readable text, effectively pre-erasing stable meaning to prioritize gestural form over content.^[24]Digital methods have gained prominence since the 2010s, enabling software-based generation of asemic forms through vector graphics programs that allow precise control over abstract glyphs and lines.^[24] Artists often scan analog drawings for subsequent digital manipulation, combining physical and computational processes to refine or animate non-semantic marks.^[23] Post-2010 advancements include AI-assisted creation, where multimodal models like DALL-E generate asemic text from prompts by producing visually script-like outputs that lack conventional semantics due to their stochastic image-focused training.^[25] Kinetic typography software also supports dynamic asemic writing, simulating fluid motion and randomization to extend traditional gestural techniques into interactive formats.^[24]

Relations to Other Art Forms

False and Constructed Writing Systems

False writing systems are artificially constructed alphabets or scripts designed to resemble genuine languages while lacking actual semantic content or readability, often employed in artistic or fictional contexts to evoke a sense of authenticity or otherness.^[5] These systems mimic the visual structure of writing—such as flowing lines, characters, and spatial arrangements—but serve no communicative function beyond aesthetic or atmospheric effect, distinguishing them from functional scripts.^[5] Early influences on asemic writing include such false systems found in comics and cartoons, where invented symbols represent alien or indecipherable text to heighten narrative immersion.^[5]Constructed writing systems, intentionally devised scripts like J.R.R. Tolkien's Tengwar, provide a foundation for asemic adaptations by offering intricate, language-like forms that can be repurposed without their original phonetic or grammatical rules.^[5] Tengwar, created for Tolkien's fictional Elvish tongues, features elegant, angular characters that, when detached from linguistic meaning, align with asemic principles through their purely visual appeal. Partial influences also stem from ideographic constructed systems such as Blissymbols, developed by Charles K. Bliss in the 1940s as a universal pictorial language for non-verbal communication, which emphasizes symbolic forms over spoken ties and can inspire asemic abstraction when semantic intent is removed.^[26] Similarly, aUI, a philosophical constructed language by W. John Weilgart from the 1950s, uses simple elemental symbols to denote concepts, offering asemic creators models for non-arbitrary, visually driven sign-making.^[27]In modern graphic novels, asemic adaptations of constructed or false systems frequently depict alien communication, prioritizing visual estrangement over any implied semantics; for instance, in Shaun Tan's The Arrival (2006), indecipherable scripts evoke the protagonist's isolation in a foreign world, using pseudo-writing to convey emotional distance without decipherable content.^[19] Unlike constructed systems that may retain pseudo-semantic rules for world-building, asemic versions emphasize raw visual impact and interpretive freedom, transforming potential linguistic tools into pure abstract expression.^[5] This overlap underscores asemic writing's roots in simulated languages while elevating it as an art form focused on gesture and form rather than simulation of meaning.^[19]

Connections to Poetry and Visual Art

Asemic writing maintains deep roots in concrete and visual poetry, where the arrangement and form of text convey meaning beyond semantics. Pioneered by figures like Guillaume Apollinaire in his Calligrammes (1918), which featured typographic shapes such as rain-like slanting lines in Il Pluit to evoke imagery, asemic writing extends this tradition by eliminating legible content entirely, transforming poetry into pure visual gesture.^[28][29] This evolution positions asemic works as "wordless poems," emphasizing the materiality of marks on the page to provoke imagistic interpretation rather than linguistic decoding.^[5] In scholarly analysis, asemic poetry systematically separates intention from expression, contrasting with visual poetry's reliance on legible elements while amplifying the haptic and compositional aspects Apollinaire introduced.^[30]Building on sound poetry's Dadaist legacy of nonsense syllables that breach conventional meaning, asemic writing further abstracts expression into silent, visual forms, suggesting words without uttering them.^[30] This connection underscores asemic writing's role in experimental poetry, where non-lexical patterns invite recognition as language through visual cues alone, fostering a metalinguistic ambivalence between drawing and script.^[5] Such ties highlight its place within broader literary movements that prioritize sensory and formal innovation over narrative content.In visual art, asemic writing intersects with avant-garde traditions, drawing from Dadaism's rejection of rational discourse, as seen in Man Ray's wordless poem Paris, Mai 1924, an iconic artifact of illegible script that embodies Dada's anti-linguistic provocation.^[31] It also resonates with Abstract Expressionism's emphasis on gestural freedom, evident in artists like Cy Twombly, whose scribbles evoke writing's rhythmic flow without semantic anchors, blurring lines between inscription and abstraction.^[32] Contemporary applications extend to installation and book arts, where asemic elements in artist's books disrupt readability to explore non-representational narrative, as discussed in interdisciplinary forums on semic-to-asemic transitions; recent anthologies, such as An Anthology of Asemic Handwriting (2024), continue to blend historical and modern examples across global visual poetry traditions.^[33][34]Interdisciplinary uses of asemic writing promote non-verbal expression across performance, therapy, and education. In performance art, collaborative asemic calligraphy events, such as those involving extended mark-making sessions, facilitate shared gestural dialogue without predefined meaning, enhancing communal creativity.^[35] Therapeutically, qualitative studies with alexithymic individuals show asemic writing enables emotional self-expression where words fail, improving mood through abstract journaling over seven days compared to verbal methods.^[36] In educational contexts, it serves as a tool for exploring subconscious communication, aligning with broader art therapy practices that foster non-verbal outlets for diverse learners.

Notable Artists and Works

Pioneering Artists

Henri Michaux, a Belgian-born poet and artist, conducted pioneering experiments in the 1950s that laid foundational groundwork for asemic writing through his gestural ink drawings like Mouvements (1950–1951), which produced script-like forms evoking automatic, unconscious expression, and later mescaline-induced works exploring similar themes.^[37] In Mouvements, Michaux employed rapid, gestural ink strokes to create "interior gestures" that mimicked writing without semantic content, critiquing conventional language as a barrier to pure creative impulse.^[10] These explorations, influenced by surrealism and Asian calligraphy, emphasized asemic forms as a universal mode bridging image and text, influencing later automatic asemic practices.^[38]Tim Gaze emerged as a key figure in the 1990s, advancing asemic writing through self-published zines and mail art networks that disseminated illegible scripts globally.^[39] Collaborating with Jim Leftwich, Gaze coined the term "asemic writing" in 1999 to describe works devoid of semantic meaning, as seen in his preface to The Oxygen of Truth.^[40] He founded Asemic Magazine in 1998, producing collections that showcased quasi-calligraphic improvisations and textual mutations, marking the first dedicated publications in the modern asemic tradition.^[39]In the 1960s, Argentine artist Mirtha Dermisache contributed significantly by developing "illegible writings"—graphic symbols resembling text but defying interpretation—beginning with her first artist's book, Libro N°1, in 1967.^[41] These works, produced amid experimental Latin American art scenes like the Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, challenged linguistic norms through books, letters, and newspapers that blurred writing and visual abstraction.^[41] Asemic elements also intersected with Fluxus circles in the mid-20th century, where artists incorporated wordless scripts into performance and intermedia works, fostering illegible expression as a form of anti-art rebellion.^[15]

Contemporary Examples

In the 2010s, Michael Jacobson advanced asemic writing through innovative print and digital publications, notably his asemic novella The Giant's Fence (2010), which consists of 80 pages of abstract, illegible script mimicking narrative structure without semantic content.^[42] His curation of the online gallery The New Post-Literate further expanded digital explorations, hosting international asemic works that blend visual poetry and experimental typography.^[43] Extending into the 2020s, Jacobson's ZIPPOGLYPHS (2020) presents futuristic hieroglyphics, evoking ancient scripts in a modern, post-literate context.^[44]Karla Van Vliet's 2020s asemic art emphasizes therapeutic expression and a sense of wonder, integrating meditative mark-making with poetic abstraction in collections like Fluency: A Collection of Asemic Writing (2020), where fluid scripts dissolve boundaries between art and language to foster emotional release.^[45] Similarly, She Speaks in Tongues (2021) combines asemic visuals with verse, creating immersive pieces that invite viewers to explore subconscious narratives.^[46] Beth W. Stewart complements this approach in her abstract paintings of the decade, incorporating asemic writing as instinctive gestures that provoke thought on resilience and subconscious emotion, often layered with vibrant colors to evoke wonder and healing.^[47] Her works, such as those described in her 2023 artist statement, use asemic elements to challenge verbal meaning and promote intuitive interpretation.^[48]Recent anthologies have spotlighted the global reach of asemic writing, including the WAAVe Global Anthology of Women's Asemic Writing and Visual Poetry (2021), which gathers contributions from diverse international artists emphasizing feminist and cross-cultural perspectives on illegible scripts.^[49] Emerging digital asemic pieces in sci-fi contexts gained traction, as seen in Federico Federici's Transcripts from Demagnetized Tapes (2021), where asemic scripts simulate alien languages and demagnetized data streams to explore linguistic disruption in speculative narratives.^[50] Continuing into 2024–2025, anthologies like An Anthology of Asemic Handwriting (2024) compile diverse historical and modern examples, underscoring the form's enduring international appeal.^[34] Non-Western artists have enriched this landscape, with Mariana Cordoba's 2020s paintings from her Colombian heritage featuring frenzied, spiritual asemic forms that blend indigenous motifs with abstract expressionism.^[51] Likewise, Genaro Barba's Mexican-inspired works in the same period incorporate layered, calligraphic asemics drawing from Mesoamerican visual traditions, contributing to a decolonized visual language.^[52]

References

source for complete article: https://grokipedia.com/page/Asemic_writing

Search This Blog

IUOMA.ORG

Asemic Writing / Asemic Drawing

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Some thoughts on Mail-Art - December 2025

Eeklo - Mail-Art DNC 1986